Rogue roofer who 'ripped off' Leamington resident is jailed for two-and-a-half years

This followed a successful investigation and prosecution undertaken by Warwickshire County Council Trading Standards.

Roofer Darren Bullaman Lee, 27 of Gilfil Road, Hill Top, Nuneaton, ‘ripped-off’ four Leamington and Nuneaton residents to the tune of £82,500 by over-charging for work to their roofs that was largely unnecessary.

Lee’s M.O. was to start with a lower quote before finding more and largely fictitious ‘problems’ with the roofs he was working on.

Costs then soared.

In one case a Nuneaton resident who called out to look at a leaky gutter ended up paying him over £43,000.

Three of the victims found Lee on trustatrader.com where he was advertising as Your Choice Roofing, The Crescent, Spalding, England, PE11 1AF.

On sentencing Lee at Warwick Crown Court, His Honour Judge Walsh said that his membership of a trusted trader scheme had given his victims ‘security and peace of mind’ such that Lee was able to convince them that work was needed on their properties, when in fact the work was ‘wholly unnecessary’.

Addressing Lee, he added that this was ‘merely a device for you to get your hands on their money’.

The victims who lived in Nuneaton and Leamington variously stated that they felt depressed and conned and that Lee’s activities had had a significant impact on their family finances and mental health.

One Nuneaton resident asked Lee to repair some cracked cement on his roof and repoint the chimney brickwork.

After a fee of £1,200 was agreed Lee told the resident that battens in the roof were rotten and needed replacing, alongside the felt.

He also claimed that he’d found woodworm.

Thicker, heavier battens were required he claimed to support the roof.

Lee costed the work at £16,000 and the resident eventually paid him £16,200.

However, an expert surveyor employed by Warwickshire Trading Standards examined the roof and found that the ‘strengthening work’ had no purpose or positive effect on the roof structure and was therefore wholly unnecessary and superfluous.

Further, there was no evidence of any decay or rotting of the roof timbers.

A second Nuneaton resident contacted Lee after being told that his roof might be leaking.

Lee looked at the roof from the outside before claiming that a ‘full roof repair’ was required.

Lee quoted £4,200 before later inflating the price to £18,000, again after discovering more ‘issues’.

When the consumer refused to pay, Lee threatened to rip off the roof tiles.

The expert surveyor concluded that the work carried out by Lee had no value as it did not benefit the roof structure.

He also examined what was left of the original roof and stated that it was in a good and structurally sound condition and require absolutely no works to be undertaken.

Lee quoted a third Nuneaton resident £11,000 for a complete new roof with new tiles, new battens and felt with all work guaranteed for 15 years.

After the work was done Lee claimed that the roof was not strong enough to support the new tiles and further structural ‘work’ was needed. Lee claimed that the guarantee could not be issued unless this extra work was done.

Lee also painted a wall and inflated the price of this work. The householder eventually paid Mr Lee £22,000.

The Trading Standards expert surveyor found that the roof did not need any strengthening and indeed the new tiles were lighter than those they replaced.

The work was also overpriced.

In the fourth case a Leamington householder asked Lee to come out to look at a leak to his guttering but ended up paying the rogue roofer over £43,000.

Lee maintained that the cause of the problem was his tiles, and that scaffolding would need to be erected.

He then claimed the tiles were disintegrating and would need replacing together with rotten battens.

Costs further escalated to include the removal of an asbestos roof on the garage which the resident was told would be done professionally. However, this was done without any specific protective measures taking place.

The homeowner eventually paid Lee £43,150.

Warwickshire County Councillor Andy Crump, portfolio holder for community safety said: “This is an appalling example of how a rogue trader took advantage of some very vulnerable Warwickshire residents to defraud them of over £82,000.”

“Rogue traders are warned that if they try to operate in Warwickshire, our Trading Standards Service will tackle them and bring them to court.”

Mitigation heard in court related largely to Mr Lee’s drug addiction that had led him into debt.

A Proceeds of Crime Act investigation has commenced and the matter will be back in Court on November 7 when compensation, confiscation and costs will be considered.